I have the nasty habit of arranging all news channels in a sequence, by language. Quite often, the same story plays on all news channels. Same face, same interviews ... what are the odds? You flip the channels and you catch the same story in every news channel. Like they are pre-programmed and synced. Worst part is I don't even consider these stories worthy of a 8 PM or 9 PM time slot.
Sample this .. Prime time news informs you that Ash and Abhishek are engaged. You are shown a repeating clip of Amitabhji trying to drive a car with the newly engaged couple seated in the back. Next story informs you that Abhishek popped the question when in Canada after Guru's premiere. Now its time for the visual to show you Guru's hoarding. Next story informs me that Amitabhji and Amar Singhji are very happy with the couple's decision. Time for these two accomplished individuals to show off their sherwanis. Next story informs me that there is celebration in a street in Allahabad. A bunch of eager-to-please street faces appear on the visuals now. Then comes the last story on the headlines where I'm informed that Ash's parents are tight-lipped about the developments.
Question: Why is the whole nation hijacked by these news channels to show us only one story? Did the whole nation come to a standstill? How come there are no other stories?
And then there is always a "breaking news". Breaking News used to be an alert! Something significant. But for our desi news channels, breaking news can be an entire cricket match covered through that narrow strip of screen space. Or it could be that some Singh kissed a Rakhi Something on the lips. Or it could be that Jade Goody has been issued a Indian VISA to travel to this country. There are more, but I'm sure you get the idea. Breaking news segment will actually flash for an hour even after moved to the headlines. So what the heck is the meaning of breaking news? There is always some news that breaks out every second, every minute, every hour. I have huge respect for CNN. Our desi news channels must learn from CNN how to be selective about announcing breaking news on their channels.
Every day, many junkies sell & buy illegal drugs. But when a Rahul Mahajan or Fardeen Khan buys stuff, its national news. Then the country wakes up to the ill-effects of drug usage and abuse. On a daily basis, asians are subjected to racial abuse in countries like UK. But when a Shilpa Shetty is hurled racial slurs on a highly paid up TV appearance, the whole nation is served the breaking news. And now even the ministry wakes up and decides to do something about it. Are we enlightened of these sorry state affairs only when led by a celebrity? Narmada Bachao Andolan needs an Aamir Khan. Sudan needs George Clooney. Afghanistan needs Angelina Jolie. Malawi needs Madonna. AIDS awareness initiative needs Richard Gere. Is activism the birth right of celebrities? Hey, is anyone aware of the work done by NGOs in this country. Some of them are working to find solutions in this country right from the grassroots level. How many NGOs have success stories that are shared in the glare of media? You still need a celebrity to draw the cameras to where the issues are. No wonder, this nation is ruled by bunch of film stars. Call it retirement planning. After a successful or unsuccessful stint at the movies, every rahul, raj and roshni choose politics. And I thought fame lasts only 15 seconds.
And then there is the middle class uprising. Now suddenly any voice raised against the atrocities is traced back to the middle class. Quota issues. RTI act. Protests on the road? Must be the middle class. Who is dissatisfied in the country? Middle class, of course. So do we have a lower class in this country? Not at all. Zilch. We only have middle class and celebrity class. India Shining you see. India Is Poised!
Anyway, I'm not able to tolerate what the news channels bring into my living room these days. Media loves the celebrities. All the national news channels must rename themselves to celebrity news channels. Every hour, the headlines will definitely contain a segment on Ash-Abhishek union. Then there is chicken curry specialist Shilpa Shake-Hips Shetty.
May be I don't need the active medium. I don't want anyone pushing insignificant news into my living room. My appetite for news is solved by passive sources on the web. Yes, I'm a RSS junkie (RSS - the web lingo and definitely not the saffron brigade). I get my daily dose of news from various trust worthy source on the web and I can choose to ignore every celebrity something.
Wonder when my television set will learn to cater content that I like; content that I truly want. Until then I have no other option but to watch Amitji telling me that he is very proud of his son for choosing Aishwarya Rai. May be I should wait for another six months to hear about domestic violence between the newly-weds.
Oh boy! India is Poised alright.